Like many of you (great comments!) I've been playing this week with what words Willie defines the same as I. As suspected, most of the words I have used to communicate with him are verbs (to him), and that appears to be his "default" understanding. He HAS learned however, names for living things, me, Jim, Sushi, my other dogs when they were alive, etc. But all his toys are either "toy" or "ball," and as I think about it that's exactly how we used those words for several years. Go "up the hill" and "go to the barn" are effective and impressive cues, but I'd bet a lot of money that he has no idea what I mean by "barn" or "hill." This weekend we're going to work on labeling an object (his scorpion, Scorch, a favorite toy that is miraculously in great shape after 2 years) by holding it, Read More
Archives for January 2011
Could you learn 1022 new nouns?
Move over Rico. Have you heard about the new article out in Beh'l Processes about a BC named Chaser who has not only learned names for 1022 objects, but has shown that she distinguishes between verbs and nouns? There's more to this study, but let me start with the noun/verb issue. This is an especially interesting issue: one of the criticisms about the research on the dog, Rico, was that there was no proof he understood a label given to an object as a noun versus a verb. In other words, if you say "Go get your ball," does your dog understand that "ball" refers to an object, or that the entire string of sounds means "go get something and bring it back". This is not a idle question. You may recall a post I wrote about Willie's difficulties discriminating between objects, "What Do Words Read More
What IS “training,” anyway?
My last post raised the question "when should one start training a dog," and we've had a lively and interesting discussion about it in the comment section. Our conversation has raised, as good conversations often do, another issue that I think deserves attention: How do you define training? Many comments have said that we are training our dogs the second we bring them home, which closely reflects my perspective. However, others have said that they "don't start training until the dog is older, they just teach them "manners" (which is closer to Kelly's perspective). One commenter said that her dog knew sit, leave it, polite leash walking, etc, but she didn't start "serious training" until the dog was older. What a perfect example of how we are all define "training" in our own way. On Read More
No Training ’til 7-8 months?
Oh my. An alert reader sent me an blog from Psychology Today's website. The essay is by Lee Charles Kelly, and argues that "dog training is no longer working that well" because we start "obedience" training too soon. The quote is actually attributed to Ian Dunbar, and Kelly uses that comment, and suggestions from psychologists that we shouldn't push young children into cognitive tasks too soon, to argue that we have no business training puppies until they are adolescents. Ironically, he suggests that Ian himself is responsible for the "problem," because he has encouraged people to take their pups to puppy socialization classes. Could I disagree more? It would be hard ... at least, if you define "training" the way I do. I'm talking about teaching a pup to associate coming when called to Read More